An impact assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic on Japanese and US hotel stocks.

This study proposes two new regime-switching volatility models to empirically analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hotel stock prices in Japan compared with the US, taking into account the role of stock markets. The first model is a direct impact model of COVID-19 on hotel stock prices; the analysis finds that infection speed negatively affects Japanese hotel stock prices and shows that the regime continues to switch to high volatility in prices due to COVID-19 until September 2021, unlike US stock prices. The second model is a hybrid model with COVID-19 and stock market impacts on the hotel stock prices, which can remove the market impacts on regime-switching volatility; this analysis demonstrates that COVID-19 negatively affects hotel stock prices regardless of whether they are in Japan or the US. We also observe a transition to a high-volatility regime in hotel stock prices due to COVID-19 until around summer 2021 in both Japan and the US. These results suggest that COVID-19 is likely to affect hotel stock prices in general, except for the influence of the stock market. Considering the market influence, COVID-19 directly and/or indirectly affects Japanese hotel stocks through the Japanese stock market, and US hotel stocks have limited impacts from COVID-19 owing to the offset between the influence on hotel stocks and no effect on the stock market. Based on the results, investors and portfolio managers should be aware that the impact of COVID-19 on hotel stock returns depends on the balance between the direct and indirect effects, and varies from country to country and region to region.

Risk premia, asset price bubbles, and monetary policy

We develop a dynamic general equilibrium asset pricing model with heterogeneous beliefs to study the effects of monetary policy on prices, risk premia, asset price bubbles, and financial stability. We propose a new framework for monetary policy with respect to bubbles. Because bubble risk premia arise from an interaction between disagreements among investors and dynamic trading constraints, under a non-accommodative monetary policy, liquidity adjusted risk and bubble risk premia increase. What matters for policy is the trading constrained fraction/mass of agents that disagree about fundamentals (i.e. optimists/pessimists). Accommodative policy can lead to a larger fraction of trading constrained agents that disagree, larger bubbles, and increased systemic risk. An implication of our results is that accommodative monetary policy in response to the Covid-19 crisis does not increase systemic risk due to asset price bubbles, as long as the policy keeps inflation under control.

Can news-based economic sentiment predict bubbles in precious metal markets?

This study examines the role of market sentiment in predicting the price bubbles of four strategic metal commodities (gold, silver, palladium, and platinum) from January 1985 to August 2020. It is the first to investigate this topic using sentiment indices, including news-based economic and consumer-based sentiments developed using different methods. We observed the role of sentiment as a reliable indicator of future bubbles for some metal commodities and found that bubbles were regularly concomitant with bearish sentiments for gold and platinum. Moreover, gold and palladium were the only commodities that experienced a bubble during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, our findings suggest inclusion of sentiment to the model that predicts the price bubbles of precious metals.

Do Commodities React More to Time-Varying Rare Disaster Risk? A Comparison of Commodity and Financial Assets

Using a rare disaster risk database from almost the last one hundred years, we examine the differences in the reaction of asset prices to rare disaster risk between commodity and financial assets. We first employ time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) models to investigate the role of rare disaster risk in the price dynamics of major asset markets. The results indicate that disaster risk generally has a more intense and persistent impact on crude oil and stock markets when compared to gold and bond markets. However, the role of rare disaster risk differs substantially between commodity and financial assets, as well as between the short and long term. Moreover, when using a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles method to detect causal relationships, we provide evidence of the nonlinear causality effect of rare disaster risks on asset volatilities, and not their returns, except for crude oil. In addition, we demonstrate that augmenting a diversified portfolio of stock or bonds with gold can significantly increase its risk-adjusted performance. The findings have important implications for investors as well as policymakers.

Timing differences in the impact of Covid-19 on price volatility between assets.

We empirically examine the impacts of Covid-19 on asset price volatilities by focusing on the timing. This paper has three contributions. First, we propose a new Covid-19 dependent regime-switching volatility model for the examination. Second, results show a shift to a higher price volatility regime from a lower one for financial assets and commodities after late February 2020 when Covid-19 spread all over the world, but the timing of the impacts varies from immediate timing for the S&P 500, the FTSE 100, the COMEX gold and silver futures to the delayed timing for the ICE Brent crude oil futures followed by the timing for the ICE UK natural gas futures. Third, we find the sensitivity of Covid-19 information to the regime switch differs between financial assets and precious metal ones which have the immediate impacts: the infection speed, i.e. the changes in the number of Covid-19 infected individuals, enhance the impacts on the tendency to a high price volatility regime for the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100; both the infection speed and the number of the deaths mitigate those impacts for the gold and silver futures, respectively during a turmoil period due to Covid-19, suggesting that the gold and silver markets are functioning as risk-hedging safety assets alternative to financial assets during Covid-19 turmoil.